Before the Dam Breaks: How Transparency in Negotiations Influence the Outcome of Large Scale Hydroelectric Projects

Level of Education of Students Involved

Undergraduate

Faculty Sponsor

James Old

College

Arts and Sciences

Discipline(s)

Political Science

Presentation Type

Oral Presentation

Symposium Date

Spring 4-25-2024

Abstract

The negotiation phase of hydroelectric dam development is vital to ensuring a satisfying outcome for most people, but those who will be affected are often left out of this process, resulting in human rights violations and wasted resources. Organizations that attempt to moderate these negotiations and make them more equitable often fail to insulate themselves from the influence of private industries and governments, which results in policy outcomes that are highly unpopular. Given the increasing demand for hydroelectric power, it is clear that a more just and independent negotiation process is necessary to avoid human rights violations and improve efficiency. By looking at recent examples, this project will analyze how increased inclusion and transparency in dam negotiations leads to more satisfying outcomes for afflicted interest groups.

Biographical Information about Author(s)

Merrick is a geography and international relations double major. He is interested in the relationship people have with their surrounding environments. Dam negotiation became an interest after seeing how displaced communities are poorly treated in the pursuit of hydroelectric development. He is an employee of the National Park Service and will pursue a career in that agency.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS