Presentation Type

Oral Presentation

Symposium Date

Spring 4-24-2013


In George Eliot’s novel, Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life, she examines the foibles and follies, the trials and tribulations of a rural community facing the uncertainties of a rapidly industrializing Britain. Provincial, however, is hardly the word that one should use to describe the romantic relationships that Eliot creates in her novel. Even less dull and dreary are the metaphoric images that Eliot’s narrator uses to describe, expand, and judge the connections between the two main couples in Middlemarch: William Ladislaw and Dorothea Brooke as well as Tertius Lydgate and Rosamond Vincy. When we explore the metaphors of Middlemarch, we can see the narrator’s deft grasp of entwining the abstract and the real. This paper examines how Middlemarch’s narrator uses similar images and metaphors of water and music to describe the development and depth of Middlemarch’s dissimilar romantic relationships. The metaphors in Middlemarch work on two levels: upon the characters and upon the reader. A discussion of the critical theory of metaphor, informed by Paul Ricoeur, explains how characters and readers use imagination to unite disparate objects in order to create truth. The perception of the individual warps this imaginative function, causing a disconnection between the truth of the object and its metaphoric representation. In Middlemarch, these flawed perceptions are the basis of the narrator’s criticism of the characters and their romantic relationships in the novel. However, the same criticism of perception can also be placed upon the reader. The reader’s task, I argue, is to interpret how Middlemarch’s narrator is using similar metaphors to portray two very dissimilar relationships. It is only after we recognize and consciously address the problems of our own perception as readers that we can grasp Middlemarch’s vision of a true egalitarian marriage.

Biographical Information about Author(s)

Full text link is to abstract only.