Independence in College Golf Scores
Level of Education of Students Involved
Arts and Sciences
Two commonly-studied ideas in sports are the "hot hand" and "cold hand" phenomenon. The "hot hand" is when an athlete performs better than expected after a good outcome. For instance, a basketball player may be more likely to make a shot after making their two previous shots. In contrast, the "cold hand" is when an athlete performs worse than expected after a bad outcome. Both of these phenomena have been studied in a variety of sports including basketball and tennis, but only a couple of studies have examined their relation to golf. In golf, there is a widely-held idea that better players are more level-headed in the face of unusually good or bad outcomes, meaning that they theoretically exhibit less of a "hot hand" and "cold hand" effect. In statistical terms, this means that the scores of better players should exhibit greater independence than the scores of worse players. Using scores from college golf tournaments, I test this idea using a Chi-Square Test of Independence and a Two-Way ANOVA Test. Surprisingly, I find that better players actually exhibit less independence in their golf scores, and have an increased chance of following up a bad hole with another bad hole. In other words, better players are more likely to exhibit a "cold hand" effect than worse players. This suggests that, contrary to popular knowledge, mental calmness may not be a major determinant of a golfer’s skill level.
VanArragon, Caleb, "Independence in College Golf Scores" (2023). Symposium on Undergraduate Research and Creative Expression (SOURCE). 1134.